This semester, my edu class at SCSU
debated which is the better way to teach reading: the whole language approach or the phonics approach. As often is the case, I don’t think there
was a clear-cut winner in this battle.
Before I weigh in with my own personal take on this comparison, let me
first define both approaches. The whole
language approach to reading instruction emphasizes learning whole words by
encountering those words in meaningful contexts. In this approach, learners
are expected to infer what they need to know while being immersed in literature. The whole language approach still allows for
"teachable moments," where educators react to children's needs/ requests
for specific guidance. Whole language is sometimes referred to as a “top
down” approach.
Phonics, on the other hand, focuses on
the sounds that the individual letters or letter combinations make. Once learned, the child can sound out words
by putting together the sounds. This
approach is sometimes referred to as a “bottom up” approach. Detractors of this approach believe that
the English language has many words that do not follow the sounds that their
individual letters make, and as a result, it could be frustrating to the
student.
In terms of which is a better method for teaching reading, I believe it depends on the grade level. I think that the upper elementary grades (3 thru 6 / even late 2 thru 6) can benefit more from a whole language approach. Above grade three, immersion is extremely important. Incorporating vast amounts of literature into a classroom fosters more of a constructivist experience, where students are inferring, comparing, predicting, etc. And if they see a new word...there ARE context clues. Detractors of whole language will say there is too much guesswork and too many situations where students are making "wild guesses"...but I see these as educated guesses by the late elementary grades. Whole language encourages students to look at the big picture rather than zeroing in on patterns, sounds, and rules like phonics does.
In terms of which is a better method for teaching reading, I believe it depends on the grade level. I think that the upper elementary grades (3 thru 6 / even late 2 thru 6) can benefit more from a whole language approach. Above grade three, immersion is extremely important. Incorporating vast amounts of literature into a classroom fosters more of a constructivist experience, where students are inferring, comparing, predicting, etc. And if they see a new word...there ARE context clues. Detractors of whole language will say there is too much guesswork and too many situations where students are making "wild guesses"...but I see these as educated guesses by the late elementary grades. Whole language encourages students to look at the big picture rather than zeroing in on patterns, sounds, and rules like phonics does.
All this being
said, the early elementary school student does need to "unlock the
alphabet" and learn the rules of reading from the bottom up. So I
agree with the assertion that phonics instruction is critically important in
the early elementary grades.
No comments:
Post a Comment