“Do learning styles matter?” My EDU professor posed this question to the
class this semester, and in doing so, he initiated a heated debate. The
consensus seemed to be that learning styles do indeed matter, and that teachers
should try their best to cater their lessons to the different learning styles
contained within their classrooms (visual, kinesthetic, auditory, etc.) But in
looking at this issue more closely, I think that what is most important
in terms of learning styles and lesson planning is that educators should adjust
and fit the modality to the content, rather than the different learning
styles of the students. If teachers ignore this strategy and design their
lessons with their students’ preferred modalities in mind (instead of with the
lesson content in mind/ best fit strategy) I think they will be selling their
students short. For example, if I were
teaching a lesson on Beethoven, I would try to incorporate a strong auditory
component, which would ideally make the lesson more powerful and memorable.
The more meaning the students assign to the lesson, the better chance they will
have to retain the information that was presented. If I were putting
together a lesson plan on the Pyramids of Egypt, I would incorporate a strong
visual component to the lesson. In each
of these examples, choosing the modality that best fits the content trumps the different preferred
learning styles of the students in my opinion.
All this being said, I think it’s critically important to mention the
role of learning styles when it comes to student responses to instruction.
It's this area where I believe that the students' modalities should be taken
into account. I think students should
be able to demonstrate their competency in the modality of their choice, if
possible. For example, if students were studying the Civil War, visual
learners might choose to summarize their learning through
pictures/illustrations, kinesthetic by constructing a three-dimensional
battlefield, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment