When I learned reading back in
elementary school, we were always divided into reading groups. Sometimes the groups were numbered, and sometimes they were named (the bluebirds, the robins,
etc.) But every student in the
classroom knew just which group was which:
high, middle, low, remedial, etc.
I never gave it much thought at the time, because reading was a strength of
mine. Looking back on it though, it
must have been hard on those who struggled and were always in that lowest
group, irrespective of the name assigned to it.
Today, there is a much stronger focus on whole-group
instruction. Here, no one is identified
as high, middle, or low. Instead, everyone reads
the same story and participates in the same mini-lesson. Once that lesson is over and the students begin
independent work, now their stories can vary according to their reading abilities,
challenging them enough so that they can learn something new, but keeping the material at
their level, so they are not frustrated.
My personal classroom plan will be to assess
each student often to best understand exactly what each one knows and what he/she
needs to learn. I will be sure that
independent work is designed to meet the individual needs of each student, but that new skills are introduced and modeled to the whole class. Then I can create small, flexible groups to
address weaknesses that certain students might have in common. In this way, no student has to be labeled as
high, middle, or low. No student has to be left wishing that everyone wasn't so aware of who is
and who is not in that coveted “high/advanced group.”
No comments:
Post a Comment